Remarkable. Whatever you choose, the endings look the same. Just don’t litter!
I have a few questions:
1. Who teleport those massive construction waste?
It was quite different from other cases: the worst crime, but the lightest punishment. There was even no one killed.
2. What’s the condition of trigger her power?
Was that she could kill anyone as long as she had TOUCHED the things they abandoned or just lost? The MC took the pen she gave him as treasure. Did it become trash once lost?
3. What would she do if she was caught by police?
She met all the victims just before she killed them. There were quite a lot evidence that showed her connection with the crime. Her strange and unconfined attitude toward the 1st victim, her home address, the volunteer pen she gave MC (if she killed him), her being volunteering near those barbecue youngsters. If she kept killing, she would definitely be caught. Then what?
4. Did she really care about the environment, or just felt offended and annoyed, but never guilty?
There are laws and punishment about littering. Pay the fine, clean it back. They can be repaired. There are also laws and punishment about murder. Worst crime. No one like murders.
No one never make trash. Some make a lot, some make few. Some put them into bins and recycle, some litter everywhere. Some countries smuggle rubbish to other countries or throw them into sea, some burn the garbage or bury them in earth. Is CO2 trash? There are so many to talk about trash. No easy answer.
Remarkable. Whatever you choose, the endings look the same. Just don’t litter!
I have a few questions:
1. Who teleport those massive construction waste?
It was quite different from other cases: the worst crime, but the lightest punishment. There was even no one killed.
2. What’s the condition of trigger her power?
Was that she could kill anyone as long as she had TOUCHED the things they abandoned or just lost? The MC took the pen she gave him as treasure. Did it become trash once lost?
3. What would she do if she was caught by police?
She met all the victims just before she killed them. There were quite a lot evidence that showed her connection with the crime. Her strange and unconfined attitude toward the 1st victim, her home address, the volunteer pen she gave MC (if she killed him), her being volunteering near those barbecue youngsters. If she kept killing, she would definitely be caught. Then what?
4. Did she really care about the environment, or just felt offended and annoyed, but never guilty?
There are laws and punishment about littering. Pay the fine, clean it back. They can be repaired. There are also laws and punishment about murder. Worst crime. No one like murders.
No one never make trash. Some make a lot, some make few. Some put them into bins and recycle, some litter everywhere. Some countries smuggle rubbish to other countries or throw them into sea, some burn the garbage or bury them in earth. Is CO2 trash? There are so many to talk about trash. No easy answer.
Thank you for this thought-provoking game!
コメントをありがとうございます!
Google翻訳を使って読みました。
日本語でお返事させて下さい。
①もちろん、彼女です。
被害者が出なかったのは、彼女が実行犯(個人)をハッキリ認識していなかった事と、自分の能力をまだ自覚していなかったためだと思われます。
②彼女が「ゴミ」だと認識した時点で、持ち主の元に返すことが出来るようになります。ペンについては主人公が「失くした」だけですが、彼女は「主人公に捨てられた」と認識したため、「ゴミ」という認識に変わったのだと思われます。
どのように持ち主の元に届けるか具体的にイメージする事で、返し方も指定できるようになったようです。
③恐らく証拠不十分で起訴できないのではないでしょうか。現場検証した警察に話を聞いてみたいですね!
④彼女はもともとルールを守ることが好きで、ルールを守らない人間に対して怒りを感じていたのだと思います。その中でも特に「ルールを守らない人間の行動に対処できる」清掃活動が好きだったのでしょう。自分は正しいことをしている、という思い込みが、彼女から罪悪感を奪ったのです。
考察をありがとうございます。楽しんで頂けて嬉しいです!
面白かったです。
BGMこわすぎた…ゲームボーイみたいで、余計に恐怖煽られました。
コメントありがとうございます!
じわりとした恐怖を楽しんで頂けたなら幸いです。